The Oklahoma City Thunder vs San Antonio Spurs match player stats reveal how San Antonio secured a memorable 111–103 road victory in Game 7 of the 2026 Western Conference Finals. Played at Paycom Center on May 30, 2026, the deciding contest sent the Spurs to the NBA Finals for the first time since 2014.
Shai Gilgeous-Alexander produced the best individual scoring performance of the night, finishing with 35 points and nine assists. However, San Antonio received double-digit scoring from seven players. Victor Wembanyama led the Spurs with 22 points, while Julian Champagnie made six three-pointers and added 20 points. That balance became the central difference between the teams.
Match Overview
San Antonio entered Game 7 after keeping the series alive with a convincing 118–91 victory in Game 6. The Spurs carried that confidence into Oklahoma City and showed impressive composure against the defending champions. Instead of depending entirely on Wembanyama, they moved the ball, created open shots and received important contributions throughout the rotation.
Oklahoma City remained competitive behind Gilgeous-Alexander, who repeatedly attacked the paint and created opportunities for teammates. Still, the Thunder were missing Jalen Williams because of a hamstring injury. His absence removed an important secondary scorer, playmaker and perimeter defender from the lineup. As the game tightened, Oklahoma City struggled to find enough consistent offense beyond its leading guard.
Final Score
| Team | Final score | Result |
|---|---|---|
| San Antonio Spurs | 111 | Won |
| Oklahoma City Thunder | 103 | Lost |
| Winning margin | 8 points | Spurs advanced |
The eight-point margin does not fully show how competitive the contest was. Oklahoma City stayed within reach during the closing stages, but San Antonio answered each serious run with an important basket or defensive stop. That ability to control the biggest moments allowed the visitors to complete their comeback from a 3–2 series deficit.
Oklahoma City Thunder vs San Antonio Spurs Match Player Stats
The following table covers the leading and most influential performers from Game 7. These numbers show the difference between Oklahoma City’s star-led attack and San Antonio’s balanced scoring approach.
| Player | Team | Points | Rebounds | Assists | Key contribution |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Shai Gilgeous-Alexander | Thunder | 35 | — | 9 | Game-high scorer |
| Cason Wallace | Thunder | 17 | — | — | Added four steals |
| Victor Wembanyama | Spurs | 22 | 7 | 2 | Led San Antonio in scoring |
| Julian Champagnie | Spurs | 20 | 6 | 1 | Made six three-pointers |
| Stephon Castle | Spurs | 16 | 6 | 6 | Strong all-around performance |
| De’Aaron Fox | Spurs | 15 | — | 5 | Added three steals |
| Dylan Harper | Spurs | 12 | — | — | Important bench scoring |
| Keldon Johnson | Spurs | 11 | — | — | Hit timely fourth-quarter shots |
| Devin Vassell | Spurs | 11 | — | — | Completed the balanced attack |
A dash means that the figure was not essential to the player’s reported contribution in this summary. The official box score remains the best reference for every minute, shooting split and individual category. However, the leading figures make the game’s main pattern clear: Oklahoma City had the top scorer, while San Antonio had greater scoring depth.
Victor Wembanyama’s Performance
Victor Wembanyama delivered 22 points, seven rebounds, two assists, one steal and one block in nearly 42 minutes. He shot 7-for-15 from the field, made three of his five three-point attempts and converted five of seven free throws. Although he did not post one of his biggest statistical games, he influenced both ends of the court.
His shooting forced Oklahoma City’s defense to respect him away from the basket. That spacing opened driving lanes for Fox, Castle and Harper. On defense, Wembanyama’s length affected attempts even when he did not record a block. His positioning helped San Antonio keep the Thunder from getting easy finishes at the rim throughout the decisive stretches.
Wembanyama was later named the Western Conference Finals MVP. Game 7 reflected why he received the honor: he remained the center of San Antonio’s system while allowing teammates to take advantage of favorable opportunities. His performance was controlled, efficient and suited to the needs of the game.
Julian Champagnie’s Shooting Impact
Julian Champagnie produced one of the most important games of his career. He scored 20 points on 6-for-11 shooting and made six of his ten attempts from three-point range. He also collected six rebounds and finished with a game-high plus-16 rating during his time on the floor.
Champagnie scored 18 of his 20 points from beyond the arc. His shooting punished Oklahoma City whenever defenders moved toward Wembanyama or attempted to close driving lanes. Instead of forcing contested attempts, Champagnie stayed ready on the perimeter and converted the open opportunities created by San Antonio’s ball movement.
His six three-pointers also changed the Thunder’s defensive choices. Oklahoma City could no longer provide as much help inside without risking another open outside shot. Therefore, Champagnie’s contribution went beyond his scoring total. He stretched the floor and made the entire Spurs offense more difficult to contain.
Stephon Castle’s All-Around Contribution
Stephon Castle finished with 16 points, six rebounds, six assists and one steal. He made seven of his 15 field-goal attempts and played almost 36 minutes. Although he committed six turnovers, his activity and physical approach helped San Antonio maintain pressure on both sides of the ball.
Castle regularly attacked the basket and worked through contact rather than settling for difficult outside shots. His six assists also showed his value as a creator. When Oklahoma City sent extra help toward the ball, he found open teammates and kept the offense moving.
Defensively, Castle helped San Antonio apply pressure against Oklahoma City’s guards. Guarding Gilgeous-Alexander required a team effort, and no defender stopped him completely. Still, Castle’s size and strength forced the Thunder star to work hard for his opportunities.
De’Aaron Fox’s Steady Control
De’Aaron Fox added 15 points, five assists and three steals while shooting 6-for-12 from the field. He also made three three-pointers. Fox did not dominate possession on every trip, but he gave the Spurs another dependable ball handler who could create a shot when the offense slowed down.
His five assists helped San Antonio maintain a balanced attack. More importantly, his three steals created transition opportunities and prevented Oklahoma City from comfortably organizing its offense. Fox’s experience proved valuable during the closing minutes, when every possession carried greater pressure.
Rather than trying to match Gilgeous-Alexander point for point, Fox played within San Antonio’s structure. He selected his moments, protected the flow of the offense and contributed defensively. It was a disciplined performance in a game where careless decisions could have changed the result.
San Antonio’s Supporting Scorers
Dylan Harper scored 12 points, while Keldon Johnson and Devin Vassell contributed 11 points each. Those three performances gave the Spurs another 34 points beyond the production of Wembanyama, Champagnie, Castle and Fox.
Johnson made two important three-pointers in the fourth quarter. Those baskets helped San Antonio respond when Oklahoma City threatened to reduce the lead. Vassell provided another perimeter scoring option, while Harper added energy and attacking ability to the rotation.
This depth placed continuous pressure on Oklahoma City’s defense. Even when the Thunder limited one player, San Antonio had another scorer available. Seven Spurs reaching double figures made it difficult for Oklahoma City to focus its defensive attention on a single matchup.
Shai Gilgeous-Alexander’s 35-Point Effort
Shai Gilgeous-Alexander led every player with 35 points and added nine assists and three steals. He shot an efficient 12-for-21 from the field, carrying a large part of Oklahoma City’s offensive responsibility.
His 35 points came through a mixture of drives, mid-range attempts and free-flowing isolation possessions. San Antonio used several defenders against him, yet Gilgeous-Alexander continued to create quality looks. He also used the attention he attracted to set up teammates, which explains his nine assists.
The problem was not Gilgeous-Alexander’s individual performance. Instead, Oklahoma City needed more consistent production around him. With Jalen Williams unavailable, the Spurs could direct extra defensive attention toward the Thunder’s primary scorer without worrying as much about a proven second option.
Cason Wallace’s Two-Way Display
Cason Wallace was Oklahoma City’s most effective supporting scorer, finishing with 17 points and four steals. His defensive activity generated extra possessions, while his scoring helped the Thunder stay close when the offense became too dependent on Gilgeous-Alexander.
Wallace showed confidence in a high-pressure setting. He attacked when opportunities appeared and competed aggressively at the point of attack. His four steals were especially valuable because San Antonio generally handled the ball with patience and avoided giving Oklahoma City easy transition chances.
However, the Thunder required several players to deliver similar production. Wallace gave them a strong two-way performance, but the combined scoring from the rest of the lineup did not match San Antonio’s depth.
The Effect of Jalen Williams’ Absence
Jalen Williams missed Game 7 because of a left hamstring injury. He had played only ten minutes in Game 6 and was ruled out of the deciding contest after struggling to move at full strength. His absence significantly changed Oklahoma City’s offensive structure.
Williams normally gives the Thunder another player who can score from different areas, create off the dribble and defend several positions. Without him, San Antonio could build much of its game plan around slowing Gilgeous-Alexander. Oklahoma City also lost a reliable option for possessions when its primary guard needed rest.
Injuries are part of postseason basketball, but Williams’ absence remains important when examining the oklahoma city thunder vs san antonio spurs match player stats. The Thunder were missing one of their most versatile players in the most important game of their season.
How San Antonio Won the Game
San Antonio won through scoring balance, timely shooting and defensive discipline. Seven Spurs finished in double figures, meaning Oklahoma City could not solve the matchup simply by limiting Wembanyama. Champagnie’s six three-pointers stretched the defense, while Castle and Fox created pressure from the backcourt.
The Spurs also produced several decisive plays late in the game. Luke Kornet made a vital block during an Oklahoma City fast break, Johnson hit timely outside shots and Vassell finished a powerful dunk near the end. Each moment reduced the Thunder’s opportunity to build momentum.
San Antonio’s ability to respond mattered just as much as its overall statistics. Oklahoma City made several attempts to close the gap, but the Spurs repeatedly answered. Their execution remained steady even as the crowd and game situation placed them under intense pressure.
What Oklahoma City Needed
Oklahoma City needed more reliable scoring outside Gilgeous-Alexander and Wallace. The pair combined for 52 points, which accounted for more than half of the Thunder’s total. That level of concentration made the offense easier for San Antonio to read during important possessions.
The Thunder also needed to prevent San Antonio’s role players from gaining confidence. Champagnie’s outside shooting became particularly costly because it forced defensive adjustments. Once the Spurs established several trustworthy scoring options, Oklahoma City could no longer direct all its attention toward Wembanyama.
Despite the defeat, the Thunder remained competitive until late in the game. Their defense created some pressure, and Gilgeous-Alexander delivered a performance worthy of the occasion. However, the missing secondary production prevented them from completing enough successful possessions to take control.
What the Result Meant
The victory gave San Antonio a 4–3 series win and its first appearance in the NBA Finals since 2014. It also completed an impressive turnaround after the Spurs fell behind 3–2 in the series. They won two consecutive elimination games, including the deciding contest on Oklahoma City’s home floor.
For the Thunder, the loss ended their attempt to defend the championship they had won in 2025. Oklahoma City still had a talented core, but Game 7 showed how injuries and limited scoring depth can become major problems against an organized postseason defense.
Final Analysis
The oklahoma city thunder vs san antonio spurs match player stats tell a clear story. Gilgeous-Alexander was the leading individual performer, scoring 35 points and recording nine assists. However, San Antonio’s seven double-digit scorers gave the Spurs more ways to produce points.
Wembanyama supplied leadership and two-way influence, Champagnie delivered outstanding perimeter shooting, and Castle offered scoring, rebounding and playmaking. Fox, Harper, Johnson and Vassell then filled the remaining gaps. That complete team performance allowed San Antonio to win 111–103 and advance to the NBA Finals.
FAQs
Who won the Oklahoma City Thunder vs San Antonio Spurs game?
The San Antonio Spurs defeated the Oklahoma City Thunder 111–103 in Game 7 of the 2026 Western Conference Finals.
Who scored the most points in the match?
Shai Gilgeous-Alexander led all players with 35 points. He also recorded nine assists and three steals for Oklahoma City.
How many points did Victor Wembanyama score?
Victor Wembanyama scored 22 points. He also collected seven rebounds, two assists, one steal and one block.
How many three-pointers did Julian Champagnie make?
Julian Champagnie made six three-pointers and finished with 20 points, six rebounds, one assist and one steal.
Why did Oklahoma City lose Game 7?
Oklahoma City lacked balanced scoring beyond Gilgeous-Alexander and Wallace. Meanwhile, seven San Antonio players scored in double figures, giving the Spurs greater offensive depth.